It is commonly assumed that creationists are a bunch of unscientific, superstitious hoboes who are trying to undermine true science.
Does a belief in creation and God hinder scientific research? Well, let’s look at the facts: Sir Francis Bacon, establisher of the scientific method, believed in creation; so did Johannes Kepler, author of New Astronomy explaining the three laws of planetary motion; Sir Isaac Newton, formulator of the laws of gravity, motion, and calculus etc.; Louis Pasteur, father of microbiology; James Maxwell, laws of electricity and magnetism; Raymond Damadian, inventor of the MRI. All of these scientists in the past and more today believed in creation and it did not interfere with their work.
Evolutionists themselves (at heart, although they don’t admit it) resurrect the old idea of spontaneous generation (it’s raining frogs and fish) in their belief that life arrived by lightning bolts. This is the latest one I heard, you never know if it’s current view or not since they have to keep scrapping their theories. The Darwinists are also being unscientific. If you watch programs like Nova, you always hear of so and so’s theory being “scientific heresy,” despite all evidence in support of it. They reject anything that doesn’t fit their infallible dogma without even considering it. Nobody seems to connect these numerous cases with evolution vs. creation, even though there is much scientific evidence for creation and against evolution. Oh, wait a second; evolution itself hasn’t even been proven yet. Question: Where are the “numerous missing links” Darwin had predicted? All the “ape men” have been debunked. They come out with a new one every year though.
But that’s another thing the Darwinists cannot stand: questioning their theory. But we’ll get to that some other time.
Recent Comments